The Midnight Meat Train Barnacles

"Poor country, crushed by the abuse of power, of infamous people who do not know what modesty, are believed to be powerful and good, what they do and everything belongs to him. Among the leaders who utterly useless fools, this country devastated by grief, but do not give you a little 'displeasure of those bodies on the ground more heat. "

(FB)

Knot After Heart Cathetization

WE NEED THE MOST 'OF EARLY NEW Left Party. SEL

WE NEED AS SOON AS THE NEW LEFT PARTY OF
G. Zanetta
We need Left and Freedom, we need a credible program that touches your head feelings and the soft underbelly of our country, we need democracy, we need to open a serious discussion after the congress of the Greens and some of the position socialist comrades. We need just LEFT. We need the left with a "program" I have a 'soul alternative, to engage progressive forces, young people and the movements of our country. That points to rebalance income increasingly diverge between social classes and areas of the country. Ensuring universal services accessible and high quality. What a great move resources to the work, sustainable development, the characterization of welfare, education, culture and research. Strongly addressing the old and new problems of public morality. It should be built a relationship between the left and the political generation that has given voice to a hope of renewal that recalls what happened after 1968: The many movements.
It 's always the need to focus work on the development of a program / project that can speak to movements and social forces. Our meeting in December will open in a political situation that has dramatically changed compared to 2008. About two years back the right to the government of the country one has to wonder how a political system that will stand on the right side is increasingly becoming a subversion of the ruling party with the laws ad personam with the declared intention to change the constitution, while the central PD is struggling, are now more than six months in Congress, from our side struggling to emerge the new union of the left and the new party that many of us have asked in Naples ..
When we speak of the weakness of the country is also one of us that we need to talk. A closer look here is the answer stronger for those who - rightly - worries about the future of the left and its historical role. It is the novelty of the historical situation that one must start, as it requires us to the need (and at the same time gives us the opportunity) to take a higher responsibility to the country.
The crux is this. On the one hand it is time to state unambiguously and back-thoughts that the whole situation requires, after the election results and the "whole market" not less but more political power and therefore more, not less strong ideas and structures capable of engaging citizens in public life and return to them equal rights and the ability to organize, to decide to count that exists throughout this whole area because it is obvious that a long history of fierce divisions will not close simply by asking each other to "do only steps behind."
We ask all of us to make that big step forward is to give an answer to a "crisis of Italian politics", on whose nature and gravity is not true that we all agree.
This is the point. We are facing a historic knot. Because it is an unprecedented crisis of the left that is not measured by numbers and statistics that are difficult to read with the cultures we have, neither with the old culture "classist" but even with the reformist learned vulgate Anglo-Saxon universities.
The class struggle is, we've lost, capitalism won it.
should rather reflect on the history of Italy and wonder at what point it's detachment from national idea of \u200b\u200bthe mass intellectuality (politicians included) which should be "flexible armor" of the country and its cement.
This is the crisis that is also in our house. It covers the country's overall way of being, as evidenced by the extreme difficulty even thinking about our past and therefore the idea that Italians are uncertain of themselves and the reasons for their being together. Most have failed in the old structural basis (the centralized state, the mixed economy, the public bank, the old compromise between the North and the South, which produces and consumes savings but providing the North - the South Bank is a new attack on the savings of the people - hand of cheap labor and a large protected market, the incessant transmigration and emigration of millions of people from the south to the north of the world), and are lacking in the old bases geo-political and geo-economic. In fact, the historical conditions through which we developed after the war becoming a country "rich" and a "power" world.
The country is sitting and it is so difficult to defend what remains of our industrial apparatus. No longer understands that we place in the international division of labor (or better understand the data on unemployment), since we are stuck in a dead end: we are no longer producers of consumer goods, ie things that we provide to low cost to the old industrial and missed the bus of new technologies to bear the challenges of a new world, expanded, where the cheap goods are produced elsewhere. It beats the economic globalization, a new form of imperialism, the export of the globalization of rights and not the war. The left is called to this responsibility, not only in Italy. Clearly, with all due respect to the recipes will certainly be useful for economists, without a big political picture there is no escape from this impasse. The decline is not just an economic fact. It is impossible for an average power of betting on the future if it has no foreign policy, though - thanks to the center right - do not know if European integration is his destiny, or if Italy is in Europe as a vassal of the United States and thus tasked with sabotage.
The decline is the renunciation of young couples to have children because social services are dismantled, is the low level of human capital because the road is the spigot of tax evasion, precarious work and the art of getting by. The latest idea is one of Tremonti preparation of the next regional elections. The emergency work and occupational safety. At the end of this year are 3 million unemployed, about 800 000 workers who have had accidents at work and over 1000 deaths. This is the Italian crisis.
is the country's desperate need to have a guide and a lack of national idea. Hence it should start our pre-founding congress and talk to all the Italian left. Formulas but not by the need to contribute to building a force for its consistency and credibility to be able to dissolve the blatant contradiction between a large social and cultural heritage, made up of resources and values \u200b\u200bwhich only a few regions of the world possess, and such failure confidence in the future for the country where he sat, not risk, not take, no children, dispelling such an immense wealth of business and entrepreneurial skills and the sacrifices of past generations, including the dead of World War II.
To do this we must not jettison the great political heritage and the extraordinary moral and intellectual groove through which our socialism and communism marked the history of Italy and Europe. It's really stupid to think of replacing this with a sort of large civil list. But it would be absurd to deny the need and urgency to "go beyond" the confines of twentieth-century socialism and reformism, but this can not result in or conformist radicalism. And so now is the time to create the new party of the left and leave the door open to other cultures and other reformers, and other socialists to cultural influences to create a true, great strategic alliance. It 's time to call the fight in the great cultures of Europe: that we, like the Social Democrats, Christian, as several friends of freedom and human dignity?
The dialogue is at this height. Downward but does not make explicit what is at stake.
We need democracy.
What is left of our democracy?. Any user of constitutional law teaches us that democracy is "an organization internal state that political power emanates from the people and is exercised by the people - a service which enables the people governed to govern itself through its elected representatives. "
accept definitions like this, a limit to the relevance of the exact sciences, in a transposition of our life experience, would be to disregard the infinite gradation of pathological conditions in front of which you can find our body at any moment of time . In other words, the fact that democracy can be defined with great precision does not mean that it works in reality. Please note we are not replacing the old bureaucracy of the first / second republic with the new bureaucracy of administrators, personal lists, the cult of personality stuff late 800, but "innovation" is only "conservation" or better yet "decommissioning" and return to medieval society.
A quick excursus through the history of political ideas leads us to four reflections often quickly dismissed with the excuse that the world is changing. Because instances of political power trying to deflect our attention from this obvious fact:
1 - in the same election system, are in conflict represented by a political vote and an abdication of civic, as is also true for the parties , you should not take the next conference with the rules of the past;
2 - is it not true that, at the precise moment when the card is introduced in the urn, (or are elected bodies of a party) voter (ol'iscritto) transfers in the hands third, without any reciprocal arrangements if the promises during the campaign (or conferences), the part of political power that had until then as a member of the community of citizens or activists of the party?;
3 - is it not true that when the government of these "elected", "institutions or party" in fact all their faults and re-fall on the shoulders of the voters or the members, and no pay?;
4 - Giving democracy and citizen participation in decisions, must be the basis of our program and our proposal in the future party.
And today is the Nobel Prize for Economics J. Stiglitz to define the problem, ("The roaring fineties", New York, 2003). "No innovation of democratic political life is possible if the private interests of large groups are more important than the interests of the community, or if faced with the overriding interests of some citizens cease to be equal." More reason to examine what is our democracy, what is its usefulness, before claiming - obsession of our age - to make it mandatory and universal.
Think of barbarism and the wars of the last century, were enough to remove two bullets, and R. J Kennedy, Luther King, two planes for the crime of the twin towers of New York. It was not enough to depose two former friends of the West which the Bin Landen and Sadan, the old arsenal of fire in the U.S. and Europe in Iraq and Afghanistan, decimating the helpless civilian population, how many deaths will count against the fine for this crime humanity, for the export of democracy. Recall that in the world today there are about 70 wars provincial indirectly managed by the Western world, intent on exporting democracy.
This caricature of democracy, missionaries of a new religion, we try to impose on the rest of the world, is not democracy.
Someone will say, but the Western democracies are not based on wealth and skin color, and inside the urn or rich citizen's vote counts just as light-skinned than the urban poor or darker skin. At the cost of cooling these enthusiasms, we say that the brutal reality of the world we live in this idyllic setting make it ridiculous, and that, in one way or another, then we end up with an authoritative body hidden under the most beautiful ornaments of democracy and us in Italy we are on track And so, the right to vote, an expression of political will, is both an act of resignation to the will itself, as the delegation to the elector candidate. At least for some people, the act of voting is a form of temporary waiver to a political action staff, held quietly until the next election, when the mechanisms of delegation will return to the starting point, to reactivate the same process. Here
should be able to turn this process. We would like the delegation has returned to men and women in the future party. This must be one of the pillars of our struggle and our political project. This waiver can be for the minority elected, the first step in a mechanism that, despite the vain hope the voters often permitted to pursue objectives that have nothing democratic and which may constitute a genuine insult to the citizens and the law. Today the delegation is snatched, in principle, nobody would think of as elected representatives in the institutions of corrupt individuals, although we know from sad experience that the high echelons of power at both national and international, are sometimes employed by criminals or their representatives. But it is also true that in the last election that took place in Italy: indicted, convicted, piduista to the government, in parliament, the electors of the mafia. Experience confirms that political democracy is not based on economic democracy and cultural diversity is of little utility. Despised and relegated forgotten archaic formulas, the idea of \u200b\u200ban economic democracy has given way to a triumphant market obscenity that led up to the global downturn of the economy. The capital has failed, failed globalization and paid workers. And the idea of \u200b\u200bcultural democracy has been replaced by the no less obscene, a massification of industrial culture, a mixture of cultures and pseudo class that you need to mask the dominance of one of them. We believe we have made progress, but in fact regress.
A genuine democracy, which flooded as a sun of its light all citizens, should start from what we have all at hand, ie the country in we are born, the society in which we live, the way in which we live, the people we encounter and their needs. If this condition is not met - and is not - are vitiated all previous arguments, namely the theoretical foundation and the empirical operation of the system and democracy.
Today in Italy, starting from an appalling and simple: in 2003 three million people "have difficulty in buying food," and the number grows every year. In Italy, not in Africa, more than 3 million people are therefore poor. Below the minimum level of decent survival. Half of those "without food" (how many of them are homeless, as that, in large cities, a flat minimum, 50/70mq, it costs no less than € 600-1200 per month?) and can not eat.
In Italy, a member of the rich West, the wise Europe, most industrialized countries of the fantastic, not everyone has the need. As a new democracy for the marginalized? .. If democracy is truly the government of the people, for the people and by the people, there would be nothing to discuss, but this is not the case. And only a cynical mind would dare to say that all is for the best in the world in which we live. It is also said that democracy is the least bad political system, and nobody points out that this resigned acceptance of a model that is content to be " the least worst, it can slow down to a quest for something "as possible and better."
We know that the democratic power by nature is always provisional. Depends on the stability of the elections, (2008-9 are proof) by the flow of ideologies and interests of the class. You can see in him a kind of barometer organic captures changes in the political will of society. But, flagrantly, there are countless seemingly radical policy alternatives, which have resulted in the change of government, but those are not really accompanied by social, economic and cultural core to suggest that the electoral verdict.
Let's face it: people have elected their governments because they will "offer" to the market. But the market conditions the governments to the "offer" their citizens, valuable material for our consumer society.
In our time of globalization, free trade, the market is the instrument par excellence of the only power worthy of the name, the economic and financial power. This is not democratic because it was not elected by the people, not by the people and especially because it has set as goals the good of the people. Unable to deny the obvious: the mass of poor call vote was never called to rule but only to succumb in the war daily, inflation, unemployment, precarious work, in practice fights every day to get to the end of the month, to survive.
Assuming a government formed by the poor, as it represents the majority, as Aristotle imagined in his "Politics", they did not have the means to change the organization of the universe of the rich who dominate them, monitor them and suffocate them, so here we have a mission to give these citizens the tools to govern, what is this if not socialism. The claim
Western democracy has entered a phase of transformation that is no longer retrograde able to stop and foreseeable consequences of which will be its own negation. There is no need for someone to assume the responsibility to dismiss it, is itself committing suicide every day.
What to do? Reform?
We know that reform, as he wrote so eloquently the author of The Leopard, is nothing if not change what is necessary because nothing changes.
We ask ourselves, has this function, the resulting reform of the Italian left? Renew it? A model for the future as we look at?. Or, at what times of the past would be democratic enough to return, and from there to rebuild it with new / old material, then the democracy we say rimettiamola questioned. If you do not find a way to re-invent not only democracy will be lost, but also hope to one day see human rights respected on this planet. That would be the most resounding failure of our time, a sign of betrayal will mark humanity.
So ... We share the newspaper, the needs of citizens. The pre-conference is a good opportunity to discuss, to restore democracy to our country, the intellectual and moral dignity and energy to get out of the downward spiral that led to the degradation of all cultural institutions, political exclusion of parliament of the left. The difference is, between a minimalist vision that acknowledges the needs and structure of the return, however, the great policy where the stakes are always the problem of the meaning of individual and collective life. Let us not obscure the primary PD.
We know that these words are intended to arouse'ironia the disenchantment of those who practice it as a therapy for domestication of the social passions, but we are convinced that without the emotional investment the prospects of a future different social training to become the first condominium quarrelsome and then a psychiatric clinic of individuals locked in a desperate loneliness.
In this respect, those who think they beat the center right with the challenge of keeping promises or failure with the analysis of financial did not understand the profoundly political and innovative of the Italian right and devastating nature of its own because it is capable of arousing mass consensus and social synthesis, exacerbating aggressive selfishness, racism and the possessive individualism of late modernity.
We come, therefore, to the point of the search for principles and ideas that may establish a new distinction between left, center and right, to regain the trust of citizens, therefore, points of reference for new ideas and a program to talk to people and get back the agreement to become the steering force are: •
The first difference is the concept of democracy and its relationship with the universal human rights. The democracy of which we speak today has become just a technique for opportunistic resource allocation "consensus" and, like all techniques, exportable without reference to cultural identity. Conversely, we believe that democracy is a form of social life oriented to the development of self through the active participation of all citizens in the decisions. Democracy establishing the distinction between public and private sectors. People want to know where they end their money. Democracy is therefore not separable from the search for truth, dall''informazione the facts on which party should take, and his main enemies are lying, suspicion, manipulation and misinformation.
• The second difference is, therefore, foreign policy, which today means nothing more and nothing less than the war on terrorism declared by Bush at the time, Blair / Brown, Sarkozy and Berlusconi and the relations between Europe and the United States with respect to the relations with other cultures and civilizations. Also in this field is the decisive difference between deception and truth. On Iraq, we witnessed all''apologia of lies and hypocrisy of the mission was humanitarian, not given to Italian citizens a fair representation of the enormous interest of economic power and world domination that led Bush to take this unfortunate action. Have been prevented, that every attempt understanding of the reasons why the Islamic world, and even the piety and the reporting of the thousands of dead civilians, women, old people and children, killed by smart bombs, not just the U.S. military. It is shameful that in a democratic country who, while strongly condemning the savagery of terrorism, expressing outrage and condemnation of the massacres of Iraqi civilians, Afghans, is excluded from the civil community and accused of complicity with the enemy. Guernica, the atomic bombs on Japan, the concentration camps we have had to leave the DNA in our outrage at the death. But now something has changed in the U.S. Obama is a new speanza.
• The third difference relates to the protection of life and the environment against the forms of hegemony of science and technology that tend to destroy the specificity of the differences between cultures and social identities. The relationship between technology and life is not only an ethical issue, but highly political, because it comes to choosing between un''omologazione essentially biological, based on the presumed neutrality of technology applied to the living, and a vision of "humanities" of the various companies. Only the great technology policy can govern without subjecting humanity to the technical system is currently linked to the economic interests of major powers.
they should share or not these considerations, in any case it is certain that if you want to beat iperpoliticità the message seems impolitic and in particular the right of Berlusconi and Bossi, you have to raise the level of debate and bring it back on the issues that can now define the terrain of high politics. The PD is not central to the model approved in part and must be recovered to a new dialogue with the left .. If you want, that is, not a way to beat the administration but a vision of society and fashion. You can still, in the era of globalization, we must talk about politics or resign themselves to the great triumph of individualism and individualized impersonal consumerism and hedonism in the form provided by the system-technical-economic system? This is the very ground on which to play the survival of the left.
The new left, are in reality mere empty words if you designate combinations without strong ideas, and values \u200b\u200bguide the focus of our discussion there is not the person. This should be discussed. From here we must begin to rebuild the Left and democracy in our country.
not miss this opportunity, we are discussing and putting in the new Left Party.

Dollhouse Game That Came With Old Computer

Essay Henri Menudier

THE WORLD SEEN FROM BERLIN. "Germany has never been so free" Essay Henri Menudier professor at the University of Paris III Sorbonne new

Over the past twenty years, Germany has found a very strong position on the international stage. To reassure its neighbors, flaunts weighting and continuity in its foreign policy.

SURPRISING constancy does not exclude that some adjustments ... Until 1990, the foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) has been characterized by a certain reserve due to his past Hitler and division in various parts of the country. Moreover, the internal context was that the foundation of the country in 1949, led to the emergence of the two pillars of the management of international relations. On the one hand, and reset the anchor West, under the guidance of the first chancellor of the FRG, Konrad Adenauer, head of the Union Christian de ¬ mocratica of Germany (CDU). Second, the open ¬ ing in the East - or Ostpolitik. Launched ¬ go from the first winter of the grand coalition between the CDU, the Christian Social Union (CSU) and the social demo ¬ tico Party (SPD) from 1966 to 1969, it will be placed ¬ cally taken up by the Registrars Willy Brandt from 1969 to 1974 , and Helmut Schmidt (SPD) from 1974 to 1982, as well as their successor, Helmut Kohl (CDU) that fits into it after it initially opposed.

You could imagine that the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the reunification of Germany would be in the shaft, unleashed a burst of nationalism, a revival of authoritarian forces, maybe a see-saw game between East and West. Upheavals which could lead to a likely break in German foreign policy. In fact, neighboring countries cone ¬ schwa changes that will make obsolete ¬ Leti most atlases: the disappearance of the Soviet Union, the Council for Mutual Economic existence as ¬ (Comecon) (1), the Warsaw Pact; emergence of new state structures: re ¬ forms to 'inside the European Union and the Al ¬ Atlantic Alliance; emergence of new conflicts in the world ...

All these events have truly impressed by Germany. However, his foreign policy has remained cautious and did not mind then ¬ departed considerably from the previous line - except in one case, when Chancellor Gerhard Schröder (SPD) refused to support U.S. military intervention in Iraq in 2003 . Over the past two decades, German leaders have in fact gone to great lengths to reassure their re ¬ foreign partner and convince them that the lessons of history had not been forgotten ¬ no.

bow to the French flag. This lack of appetite

¬ tion should change with institu ¬ tions such country-specific as to the person ¬ ality of its political leaders. First, the belief ¬ pluralism, with a wide distribution of powers between the regions (Länder) and federal state urges parties to cooperate rather than to address them. The real disagreements on foreign policy guidelines (anchor West, reset, Ostpolitik, € ¬ missiles) date from before 1989. After the re ¬ unification, prevailing consensus ¬ am rather pious - except, recently, the issue of Inter ¬ wind military in Afghanistan where German soldiers were uc ¬ cise.

Moreover, the Basic Law, particularly Article 65 entrusts the Registrar with the task of outlining the political mainstream. Although the law states that, in this context, "all I-Dniester federal department heads his own car ¬ nomamente and under its responsibility," the power of the head of government is not disputed, and often that its foreign minister is vice-chancellor and even presidents of the other party of the coalition.

loyal to a community approach and multilateral ¬ eral, the various Registrars have managed the crisis by favoring civil solutions. The use of military means, very restrictive, only intervenes at the request of international organizations such as EU, NATO or the UN, and with the consent of Par-tion. Pragmatism, and a weight that did not prevent the new Germany,
very lucid about his interests, to exercise full responsibility increased.

Helmut Kohl (1982-1998), considering the ages of spiritual de ¬ Adenauer, immediately worked to address concerns about his foreign policy ac ¬ declaring that the unity of his country and that Europe was the two sides of one coin. He was one of the main architects of the EC Treaty ¬ Maastricht, signed in 1992, and the Institution of Economic ¬ I and Monetary Union (EMU). The policy must also be ¬ European Union has been and will of NATO to Eastern Europe. An ¬ at the cost of bitter negotiations, Kohl has never ceased to seek the consent of Paris. He said with malice: "In front of the French flag, dob ¬ BIAM always bow twice (2).

numerous tensions with Paris

aware of the limitations and constraints imposed on the country in 1989, Kohl declined the U.S. offer to become the preferred partner. ¬ However Tut are reasons with constitutional ¬ tion - forbidding the Bundeswehr, the new army created in 1955, to intervene outside the borders of NATO - and practical vietaro ¬ no to Germany to participate in the war against Iraq, ¬ after the invasion of Kuwait in 1990-'91. A war that the country supported this common ¬ through a substantial financial contribution ¬ cial, said "politics of checks." In conse ¬ quently, and after the Constitutional Court had faith ¬ eral authorized in 1994 ¬ Tari German military interventions outside the geographical area co ¬ discovery of the Atlantic Alliance, Helmut Kohl began the necessary reform of the Bundeswehr for age ¬ volarne development.

The opposition, the SPD and Greens have criticized the "militarization" of foreign policy. But few months after their arrival in power since Mar ¬ zo June 1999, the Bundeswehr took part in the NATO bombing against Serbia, ¬ nell'inten to - this is the official justification - to provide for ne a "genocide" in Kosovo. Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer (Greens) justified this intervention with a reference to the facts of Auschwitz, "that should not happen again." The government argued that the concept of the common € ¬ European security and Defence Policy (ESDP), and sent soldiers in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Africa.

However the development of the Yugoslav crisis had no ¬ subject Germany to the fires of criticism (3). In December 1991, after encouraging their secession, had in fact hastily recognized Croatia and Slovenia. This de ¬ cision to go it alone earned her exclusion from the negotiations on the former Yugoslavia for two years. At the time of the intervention in Kosovo - ¬ tico problem because it lacks an explicit UN mandate - the Bundeswehr is deployed with its NATO allies to end, according to the German authorities ¬ peaches, the violation of human rights by Serbs, in order to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe and is ¬ stabilize the region.

Nevertheless, the unilateralism of American policy, his work around the international law and the flaunted contempt for the UN more and more disliked in Berlin. Despite the "unlimited solidarity towards ¬ TY ' promise to George W. Bush ¬ Guito if the attacks of 11 December 2001, Schroder (1998-2005) broke spectacularly with him by refusing to involve his country in the war against Iraq. "The key issues relating to the German nation are treated in Berlin and nowhere else," he proclaimed with Schroder for ¬ za to Parliament September 13, 2002. You probably will not be the financial crisis, economic and social ¬ mica triggered by the failure of Leh man Brothers in 2008 ¬ to ¬ not induce the current government to change course.

Freed from any inferiority complex and de ¬ CISO to loudly defend the interests of na-tional, Schroder sometimes made statements prendenti ¬ sor, especially when he said, in of December 2008: "More than half of the money to burn ¬ is paid by the Germans in Europe (4)." In follow ¬ to, any disagreement with Paris have multiplied: in 1999, about the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which is deemed too expensive by Schroder, in 2000, during negotiations on the Treaty of Nice, ir during the dispute about the new weighting of votes in the Council of Europe. However, he worked in a rapprochement between Paris and Moscow, while some ¬ taken apart as the champion of a "German way" (Weg der deutsche) unpleasantly reminded that the details of the 'African way' (Sonderweg) of the second half of the nineteenth century . After the bankruptcy ¬ tion of national movements and liberal, in 1848, the construction of the state and the unification of Germany had resulted in a context of rapid industrialization, in a register me ¬ authoritarian and pan-Germanic, which is opposed to the Western powers.

disappointment within the Union. Despite these linguistic unpleasantness

¬ tics, Schroder was able to handle the report with cautious ¬ tional determination: he has completed the expansion of the Na ¬ and to the Union and did adopt the draft European Constitution that French workers would have dismissed May 29, 2005. In the same year he accepted the victory with hard work, by a narrow margin, a woman, Angela Merkel - who, moreover, supported the Bush policy ...

Chancellor Merkel has resumed dialogue with the United States, made the German foreign policy less dependent on France and moved away from Russia, where President Putin was regarded as disrespectful of human rights. Using tones mo ¬ ered, Merkel sometimes softened his position without giving up its goal: Germany must take more responsibility. In the eyes of the Germans, it has captured a large international authority ¬ de ¬ suc cess chairing the European Council and the G7 in 2007.

claimed successes include the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon to ¬, the resumption of EU-Russia partnership and the Kyoto Protocol on climate. Engaged in the search for peace in the Middle East, Merkel has begun a dialogue with Israel and the Palestinian ¬ sis. Finally, it flaunts a persistent interest to Africa (5) and has never questioned the Bundeswehr's international operations.

very attentive to his partner, Chancellor, however, does not hesitate to disagree with, even with op-porvisi. The management of the financial crisis and eco ¬ nomic world it has created numerous tensions between Paris and Berlin (6). The Merkel ¬ critical to President Bush about the prison if the already-Grete: "An institution like Guantanamo can not and should not have long-term ¬ it," he said in January 2006 (7).

To avoid vexing Russia, Angela Merkel called for the postponement of the entry of Georgia and Ukraine into NATO. The threats of retaliation there ¬ sis have not prevented it from receiving the Dalai Lama in 2007 and to ignore the aperture, ¬ tion of the Olympic Games in Beijing in 2008, because his foreign policy was proposed other objectives, the Court could offer the luxury said of a steam passenger ¬ Beijing. Especially since China can not do without Germany in economic terms.

Nevertheless, the anchor remains the foundation of West Germany's relations with the rest of the world is not placed at equal distance between Washington and Moscow does not believe to be a central power in Europe. Moreover, the crucial challenges that arise in the XXI century Zano ¬ strengthen a multilateral approach.

euro-Atlantic's commitment is based on the Franco-German cooperation, integration € ¬ sion and the Atlantic partnership built with the United States and NATO - two difficult to separate. The declaration of Robert Schuman (May 9, 1950) (8) and the Elysée Treaty (1963) - Treaty of friendship and cooperation between Bonn and Paris - the Franco-German couple plays a leading role in European integration. But it tends to dilute its influence with the subse-quent enlargement of the Union, and despite blatant embraces, the consultation will not prevent the severe clashes content to give this perennial gestation in Europe. As a result we often hear about a funnel ¬ tion of a disappointment, even to an imbal-Franco-German relations.

The fact is that, beyond the differences of style and personality, Sarkozy and Angela Merkel were in disagreement on the draft of an I ¬ Mediterranean area (from which Germany would be excluded) become Union for the Mediterranean independence of the European Central Bank (ECB) and European Union on economic management. Al ¬ three differences appeared about the solutions to the financial and economic crisis and re ¬ organization of the international financial system. Finally, the voltages determined by Greek crisis bring out opposing positions on the issue of 'European solidarity'.

In fact, in March 2010, not to encourage the "laxity" which, in its opinion, the risk of dissem-ders in the euro zone, Angela Merkel shows intransigent against un'Atene battered financial markets. On 23 March, the Chancellor is able to impose its own solution: the use of the IMF and bilateral aid. To reassure the world of finance, on April 11, we arrive at a new ac ¬ Europe Agreement. The amount of bilateral loans will be commensurate with the share that each state has the capital of the ECB, of which Germany is the first contributor. Two approaches are com ¬ pleted: management rigorous in the euro area (po ¬ German position) should go hand in hand with solidarity and a real coordination of economic policies (French position), sen ¬ za tap the ECB's independence.

However, the Franco-German entente is indi ¬ pensable: if it is not enough to move Europe forward, his death would prevent progress re ¬ ago. Moreover, the differences between the two countries, often advertised, should not make ¬ forgetting the importance of convergence - that the close cooperation of their daily go ¬ painted, very busy at the European level, highlights.

The fact is that Europe, closely linked to the story you ¬ desca, keeps a fundamental importance to this country after 1945, it gave a kind of identity substitution and built ¬ to the framework in which the country has been able, gradually recovering its sovereignty confiscated by the Allies. This is the reason why Germany has always held a prominent role in it ¬ tiations Europe. If, however, the 90's, Berlin has prioritized the expansion at the expense of the deepening today shows less interest ¬ tion, more readily accepts the intergovernmental coopera ¬ do not hesitate to defend its interests - as well as other countries.

In 2006, Fischer had pulled the bell of alarm, denouncing "a shift of perspective pro- fatal ", adding:" Europe has stopped being the central project of the German political ca ¬ '(9) and would be seen too much through the prism distorting ¬ to ¬ tional national interests. Both Schroder supported the entry of Turkey into Europe, but Merkel opposes ¬ go, suggesting a privileged partnership, with the risk of displeasing the U.S. ally.

However, the disagreement with Washington about the war in Iraq in 2003 and the disappointment ostentatious by Angela Merkel in front of the little interest shown by President Obama to Europe must not obscure the umbilical link that unites these two powers since 1949. The United States is the origin of the FRG, they have facilitated reconstruction of the country through the Marshall Plan, have provided security and that of Berlin during the Cold War and organized the reset checked in here ¬ framework of NATO. Although the conflicts have been spo ¬ on the outskirts or outside Europe, Ger ¬ mania still depends on U.S. military presence within its borders and, more ¬ lar Similarly, on the mainland.

An extensive network of multilateral cooperation.

THANKS to the collapse of the Iron Curtain in 1989-'90, Germany has fully restored its traditional links with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Reco). Relations with the Polo ¬ nia and the czech Republic, the subject of much atten ¬ tion, However, this remains difficult because of the e-spulsione of Germans from these countries in 1945. Berlin has also developed an active policy of neighborly relations with neighboring states of Russia (¬ Belarus, Russia, Ukraine and Moldova) and in the name of prevention of conflicts, expressing interest to secure the arrangements of the Caucasus (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan ) and Central Asia.

In Germany, the solution of serious problems in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Pa ¬ kistan or Iran is the responsibility of organizing ¬ international organizations of which it is a major financial contribution. The policy seeks to restrict the use of force to give priority to multilateral solutions.

In 1990, the promise of substantial economic and financial aid has convinced the USSR to accept German unity. For reasons related to the past (the history of Russian and German empires, world wars of the twentieth century), but also for ra ¬ economic regions (the energy dependence) and strategic (the peace in Europe), relations with Russia are of primary importance for Berlin. The German leaders are careful to show savings ¬ miari a power that has lost a lot of power in the last twenty years. They intertwined with Russia a close network of bilateral cooperation, European and multilateral, while taking care not to awaken the fears of the re ¬ Reco, which have not-forgetting of the protection of the Kremlin.

criticism arose in the lives Following the proposed gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea, directly linking Russia and northern Germany, illustrate it be ¬ precautions to be taken by the German leaders. These accusations have been heard since other partners, including France, are now as-ciated with the project. Apart from the crisis poly ¬ cies (Chechnya and Georgia) and persistent disagreement on the issue of human rights, the continued consolidation of economic cooperation and the reduction of energy dependence Ger ¬ maturity are considered key points. In order to assure stability, Berlin, Moscow wants to be a full partner - this objective is relatively easy, compared with the overall ¬ sity of the Asian puzzle.

Asia represents a broad set too diverse for it to be sum-sarily describe the policy followed by Berlin with ¬ in the sides of this continent. If re-gional approach draws a distinction between eastern Asia that ¬ (China, Japan, Korea), the South-East Asia (in particular the countries of the ten ¬ actions in Southeast Asia [ASEAN]) and the Indian sub-continent of Asia (particularly Afghanistan. India and Pakistan). China, in the
2009. has overtaken Germany as the leading power exporter in the world, is the object of great attention, but some years you see a increas developing countries, leading players in international relations in the future.

In its inaugural government statement of 20 September 1949, the first chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, had set three objectives for the Federal Republic which, at that time still did not have a Ministry of Foreign Affairs: national sovereignty and equality rights with other na ¬ tions, European, unification. Thanks to a policy that has been able to ade ¬ guarsi to internal changes and developments in the international context, these objectives were met October 3, 1990. Speaking for the first time to Members, November 30, 2005, Chancellor Merkel noted: "Germany has never been as free as it is today."

(1) Organisation for Mutual Economic Assistance between the countries of the communist bloc.
(2) Quoted by Maxime Lefebre, L'Allemagne et l'Europe ", Revue Internationale et Stratégique, n ° 74, Armand Colin, Paris, 2009
(3)" The responsibility of Germany and the Vatican in the acceleration of the crisis 'were' manifestly overwhelming, "declares June 16, 1993 the French foreign minister Roland Dumas. Please read Paul-Ma ¬ Rie de La Gorce, "Les divergences allemandes ex-mises to nu", Le Monde Diplomatique, September 1993.
(4) Quoted by Jacques Pierre Gougeon, L'Allemagne du XXI sits, une nouvelle nation, Armand Colin, Paris, 2009.
(5) Raf Custers read, "The secret intentions of the European countries", Le Monde diplomatique edition, July 2006.
(6) Backed by a strict policy of wage austerity, the German trade balance is flaunting an important focus. This imbalance has been recently criticized (although measured in terms of well ¬) ¬ e the French economy minister, Christine Lagarde. In fact, the assets Germans know ¬ not, necessarily, at ... deficits of its trading partners, including France.
(7) Der explained, Hamburg, January 7, 2006.
(8) II French foreign minister announced the project of the European Coal and Steel Community (Ce ¬ ca), based on un accordo franco-tedesco e realizzato nel 1951.
(9) DerSpiegel, 21 dicembre 2008. (Traduzione di mgg)

Best Place For Brazilian Wax Mississauga

receive and socialized Committee for the memory of the Italians killed by German Nazis

Press

On Sunday 16 May 2010 the City Kessariani of the events of May 1, 1944 - 2010, 66 years of memory - "remember the past to build the future ", organized event - wreath in honor of the 200 Greek patriots executed on May Day 1944 and all patriots executed by the occupying forces in shooting Kessariani.

For those who do not know the shooting Kessariani next the Greek patriots executed by German Nazis in the period from 29/11/1943 to 8/9/1944 and from 21 Italian anti-fascists whose names have only recently after so many years were known.
The Committee of Italians who fought to have disclosed the names of the executed
Italian anti-fascists, honoring memory for the first time, even after 66 years lodge a few flowers as a small tribute of respect.

Price in the national resistance and Greek Italians.
For peace, justice and democracy to all peoples.
The story does not change, the memory is vivid.

The Committee on the minds of Italians executed by German Nazis:

Claudia Capone
Manolis Kassimatis
Alexis Kilismanis
Angel Saratsini
Ivan Suriname


Comunicato stampa.
Sunday, May 16, 2010 in the town of Kessariani 'scope of action for May 1, 1944 - 2010, 66 years of memory - "remember the past to build the future" - is organizing a demonstration at the firing range of Kessariani, with deposition flowers in honor of the 200 Greek patriots killed May 1, 1944 and all the victims of the occupying army shooting range in the fall of Kessariani.
For those who do not know, in this polygon, alongside the Greek patriots, were killed by the Germans during the period from November 29, 1943 to 'September 8, 1944, including 21 Italian anti-fascists, whose names were only recently disclosed. The Committee of Italians
who have struggled to know and make known the names of the Italian anti-fascists were killed, although for the first time in 66 years, puts a few flowers in memory as a tribute of honor and deep respect.
Honour to national resistance Greek and Italian.
For peace, justice and democracy for all peoples.
History does not change, memory and 'alive.
The Committee on the memory of the Italians killed by Nazi Germany: Claudia Capone

Manolis Cassimatis-Damiani
Alexis Kilismanis
Angelo Saracini
Ivan Surina

151 Original Pokemon Poster

are too.

Why all this angst? I wasted a whole day. I could do many things, but I locked up inside me and I could not react. I hope that tomorrow will be different, I will have the grit to fight back.

I have a temper. I always had to fight myself. I'm so and I can not change.

Anguish, go away!!

"Living is an act of faith, in the flutter" (LL)

Optiva Drops And Co0ntact Lenses

we are close to early elections .......

WE NEED AS SOON AS THE NEW LEFT PARTY OF
We need Left and Freedom, we have need a credible program that touches your head feelings and the soft underbelly of our country, we need democracy, we need to open a serious discussion after the congress of the Greens and the position of some fellow Socialists. We need just LEFT. We need the left with a "program" that has a 'soul alternative, to engage progressive forces, young people and the movements of our country. That points to rebalance income increasingly diverge between social classes and areas of the country. Ensuring universal services accessible and high quality. What a great move resources to the work, sustainable development, the characterization of welfare, education, culture and research. Addressing strongly the old and new problems of public morality. It should be built a relationship between the left and the political generation that has given voice to a hope of renewal that recalls what happened after 1968: The many movements.
It 's always the need to focus work on the development of a program / project that can speak to movements and social forces. Our meeting in December will open in a political situation that has dramatically changed compared to 2008. About two years back the right to the government of the country one has to wonder how a political system that will stand on the right side is increasingly becoming a subversion of the ruling party with the ad personam laws with the expressed will to change the constitution, while the center of the PD is struggling, are now more than six months in Congress, from our side struggling to emerge the new union of the left and the new party that many of us have asked in Naples ..
When we speak of the weakness of the country is also one of us that we need to talk. A closer look here is the most powerful answer to those who - rightly - worries about the future of the left and its historical role. It is the novelty of the historical situation that one must start, as it requires us to the need (and at the same time gives us the opportunity) to take a higher responsibility to the country.
The crux is this. On the one hand it is time to state unambiguously and back-thoughts that the whole situation requires, after the election results and the "whole market" not less but more political power and therefore more, not less strong ideas and structures capable of engaging citizens in public life and return to their equal rights and the ability to organize, to decide to count that exists throughout this whole area because it is obvious that a long history of fierce divisions will not close simply by asking each other to "do only steps behind."
We ask all of us to make that big step forward is to give an answer to a "crisis of Italian politics", on whose nature and gravity is not true that we are all agree.
This is the point. We are facing a historic knot. Because it is an unprecedented crisis of the left that is not measured by numbers and statistics that are difficult to read with the cultures we have, neither with the old culture "classist" but even with the vulgate reformist learned Anglo-Saxon universities.
The class struggle is, we've lost, capitalism won it.
should rather reflect on the history of Italy and wonder at what point it's detachment from national idea of \u200b\u200bthe mass intellectuality (politicians included) which should be "flexible armor" of the Country and its cement.
This is the crisis that is also in our house. It covers the country's overall way of being, as evidenced by the extreme difficulty even thinking about our past and therefore the idea that Italians are uncertain of themselves and the reasons for their being together. Most have failed in the old structural basis (the centralized state, the mixed economy, the public bank, the old compromise between the North and the South, which produces and consumes savings but providing the North - the South Bank is a new attack the savings of the people -, low-cost labor and a large protected market, the incessant transmigration and emigration of millions of people from the south to the northern hemisphere), and are lacking in the old bases geo-political and geo-economic. In fact, the historical conditions through which we developed after the war becoming a country "rich" and a "power" world.
The country is sitting and it is so difficult to defend what remains of our industrial apparatus. No longer understands that we place in the international division of labor (or better understand the data on unemployment), since we are stuck in a dead end: we are no longer producers of consumer goods, ie things that we provide to low cost to the old industrial and missed the bus of new technologies to bear the challenges of a new world, enlarged where the cheap goods are produced elsewhere. It beats the economic globalization, a new form of imperialism, the export of the globalization of rights and not the war. The left is called to this responsibility, not only in Italy. Clearly, with all due respect to the recipes will certainly be useful for economists, without a big political picture is not out of this impasse. The decline is not just an economic fact. It is impossible for an average power of betting on the future if it has no foreign policy, though - thanks to the center right - do not know if European integration is his destiny, or if Italy is in Europe as a vassal of the United States and thus tasked with sabotage.
The decline is the renunciation of young couples to have children because social services are dismantled, is the low level of human capital because the road is the spigot of tax evasion, precarious work and the art of getting by. The latest idea is one of Tremonti preparation of the next regional elections. The emergency work and occupational safety. At the end of this year are 3 million unemployed, about 800 000 workers who have had accidents at work and over 1000 deaths. This is the Italian crisis.
is the country's desperate need to have a guide and a lack of national idea. Hence it should start our pre-congress incorporation and talk to all the Italian left. Formulas but not by the need to contribute to building a force for its consistency and credibility to be able to dissolve the blatant contradiction between a large social and cultural heritage, made up of resources and values \u200b\u200bwhich only a few regions of the world possess, and such a lack of confidence in the future for which the country has sat down, not risk, not take, no children, dispelling such an immense wealth of business and entrepreneurial skills and the sacrifices of past generations, including the deaths of World War II.
To do this we must not jettison the great political heritage and the extraordinary groove moral and intellectual by which socialism and communism have marked our history of Italy and Europe. It's really stupid to think of replacing this with a sort of large civil list. But it would be absurd to deny the need and urgency to "go beyond" the confines of twentieth-century socialism and reformism, but this can not result in or conformist radicalism. And so now is the time to create the new party of the left and leave the door open to other cultures and other reformers, and other socialists to cultural influences to create a true, great strategic alliance. It 's time to call the fight in the great cultures of Europe: that we, like social democratic, Christian, as several friends of freedom and human dignity?
The dialogue is at this height. Downward but does not make explicit what is at stake.
We need democracy.
What is left of our democracy?. Any user of constitutional law teaches us that democracy is "an internal organization of the state that political power emanates from the people and is exercised by the people - a service which enables the people governed to govern itself by means of their elected representatives. "
accept definitions like this, a limit to the relevance of the exact sciences, in our experience of a transposition life would be to disregard the infinite gradation of pathological conditions in front of which you can find our body at any moment of time. In other words, the fact that democracy can be defined with great precision does not mean that it works in reality. Please note we are not replacing the old bureaucracy of the first / second republic with the new bureaucracy of administrators, personal lists, the cult of personality stuff late 800, but "innovation" is only "conservation" or better yet "decommissioning" and return medieval society.
A quick excursus through the history of political ideas leads us to four reflections often quickly dismissed with the excuse that the world is changing. Because instances of political power trying to deflect our attention from this obvious fact:
1 - in the same election system, are in conflict represented by a political vote and an abdication of civic, as is also true for the parties , you should not take the next Congress with the rules of the past;
2 - is it not true that, at the precise moment when the card is introduced in the urn, (or are elected bodies of a party) voter ( ol'iscritto) moved into third hands, without any reciprocal arrangements if the promises during the campaign (or conferences), the part of political power that had until then as a member of the community of citizens or activists of the party?;
3 - is not it true that when the government of these "elected", "institutions or party" in reality then all their errors re-fall on the shoulders of the voters or the members, and no pay?;
4 - Return to the citizens of democracy and participation in decisions, must be the basis of our program and our proposal in the future party.
And today is the Nobel Prize for Economics J. Stiglitz to define the problem, ("The roaring fineties", New York, 2003). "No innovation of democratic political life is possible if the private interests of large groups are more important than the interests of the community, or if faced with the overriding interests of some citizens cease to be equal. " More reason to examine what is our democracy, what is its usefulness, before claiming - obsession of our age - to make it compulsory and universal.
Think of barbarism and the wars of the last century, were enough to remove two bullets, and R. J Kennedy, Luther King, two planes for the crime of the twin towers of New York. It was not enough to depose two former friends of the West which the Bin Landen and Sadan, the old arsenal of U.S. fire in Iraq and Europe and Afghanistan, decimating the helpless civilian population, who were on death to the fine for this crime against humanity, for the export of democracy. Recall that in the world today there are about 70 wars provincial indirectly managed by the Western world, intent on exporting democracy.
This caricature of democracy, missionaries of a new religion, we try to impose on the rest of the world, is not democracy.
Someone will say, but the Western democracies are not based on wealth and skin color, and inside the urn or rich citizen's vote counts just as light-skinned than the urban poor or darker skin. At the cost of cooling these enthusiasms, we say that the brutal reality of the world we live in this idyllic setting make it ridiculous, and that, in one way or another, then we end up with an authoritative body hidden under the most beautiful ornaments of democracy in Italy and we are on track And so, the right to vote, an expression of political will, is both an act of resignation to the will itself, as the delegates to a candidate the voter. At least for some people, the act of voting is a form of temporary waiver to a political action staff, held quietly until the next election, when the mechanisms of delegation will return to the starting point, to reactivate the same process.
Here you should be able to turn this process. We would like the delegation has returned to men and women in the future party. This must be one of the pillars of our struggle and our political project. This waiver can be for the minority elected, the first step in a mechanism that, despite the vain hope the voters often permitted to pursue objectives that have nothing democratic and which may constitute a genuine insult to the citizens and the law. Today the delegation is snatched, in principle, nobody would think of as elected representatives in the institutions of corrupt individuals, although we know from sad experience that the high echelons of power both nationally and internationally, sometimes are occupied by criminals or their representatives. But it is also true that in the last election that took place in Italy: indicted, convicted, piduista to the government, in parliament, the electors of the mafia. Experience confirms that political democracy is not based on economic democracy and cultural diversity is of little utility. Despised and relegated into oblivion archaic formulas, the idea of \u200b\u200ban economic democracy has given way to a triumphant market obscenity that led up to the global downturn of the economy. The capital has failed, failed globalization and paid workers. And the idea of \u200b\u200bcultural democracy has been replaced by the no less obscene, a massification industrial cultures, a mixture of cultures and pseudo class that you need to mask the dominance of one of them. We believe we have made progress, but in fact regress.
A genuine democracy, which flooded as a sun of its light all citizens, should start from what we have all at hand, the country we are born, the society in which we live, the way in which we live, the people we meet and their needs. If this condition is not met - and is not - are vitiated all previous arguments, namely the theoretical foundation and the empirical operation of the system and democracy.
Today in Italy, starting from an appalling and simple: Since 2003 three million people "have difficulty in buying food," and the number grows every year. In Italy, not in Africa, more than 3 million people are therefore poor. Below the minimum level of decent survival. Half of those "without food" (how many of them are homeless, as in the larger cities, a flat minimum, 50/70mq, it costs no less than € 600-1200 per month?) And can not eat.
In Italy, a member of the rich West, the wise Europe, most industrialized countries of the fantastic, not everyone has the need. As a new democracy for the marginalized? .. If democracy is truly the people's government, for people and by the people, there would be nothing to discuss, but this is not the case. And only a cynical mind would dare to say that all is for the best in the world in which we live. It is also said that democracy is the least bad political system, and nobody points out that this resigned acceptance of a model that is content to be the "least bad", can slow to a quest for something "as possible and better."
We know that the democratic power by nature is always provisional. Depends on the stability of the elections, (2008-9 are proof) by the flow of ideologies and interests of the class. You can see in him a kind of barometer organic that captures changes in the political will of society. But, flagrantly, there are countless seemingly radical policy alternatives, which have resulted in the change of government, but those are not really accompanied by social, economic and cultural core to suggest that the electoral verdict.
Let's face it: people have elected their governments because they will "offer" to the market. But the market conditions the governments to the "offer" their citizens, valuable material for our consumer society.
In our time of globalization, free trade, the market is the instrument par excellence of the only power worthy of the name, the economic and financial power. This is not democratic because it was not elected by the people, not by the people and especially because it has set as goals the good of the people. Unable to deny the obvious: the mass of poor call vote was never called to rule but only to succumb to the daily war, inflation, unemployment, precarious work, in practice fights every day to make ends month, to survive.
Assuming a government formed by the poor, as it represents the majority, as Aristotle imagined in his "Politics", they did not have the means to change the organization of the universe of the rich who dominate them, monitor them and suffocate them, so here we have a mission to give these citizens the tools to govern, what is this if not socialism. The claim
Western democracy has entered a phase of transformation that is no longer retrograde able to stop and foreseeable consequences of which will be its own negation. There is no need for someone to assume the responsibility to dismiss it, is itself committing suicide every day.
What to do? Reform?
We know that reform, as he wrote so eloquently the author of The Leopard, is nothing if not change what is necessary because does not change anything.
We ask ourselves, has this function, the resulting reform of the Italian left? Renew it? A model for the future as we look at?. Or, at what times of the past would be democratic enough to return, and from there to rebuild it with new / old material, then the democracy we say rimettiamola questioned. If you do not find a way to re-invent not only democracy will be lost, but also hope to one day see human rights respected on this planet. That would be the most resounding failure of our time, a sign of betrayal will mark humanity.
So ... We share the newspaper, the needs of citizens. The pre-congress is a good opportunity to discuss, to restore democracy to our country, the intellectual and moral dignity and energy to get out of the downward spiral that led to the degradation of all cultural institutions, political exclusion of the parliament of the left. The difference is, between a minimalist vision that acknowledges the needs and structure of the return, however, the great policy where the stakes are always the problem of the meaning of individual and collective life. Let us not obscure the primary PD.
We know that these words are intended to arouse'ironia the disenchantment of those who practice it as a therapy for domestication of the social passions, but we believe that without the emotional investment the prospects of a future different social training to become the first fighter a building and then a psychiatric clinic of individuals locked in a desperate loneliness.
In this respect, those who think they fly with the center-right to challenge the failure of promises of financial analysis or did not understand the profoundly political and innovative of the Italian right and devastating nature of its own because it is able to elicit consent mass and social synthesis, exacerbating aggressive selfishness, racism and the possessive individualism of late modernity.
We come, therefore, to the point of the search for principles and ideas that may establish a new distinction between left, center and right, to regain the trust of citizens, therefore, points of reference for new ideas and a program to talk to people and get back the agreement to become the steering force are: • The first difference
is the conception of democracy and its relationship with the universal human rights. The democracy of which we speak today has become just a technique for opportunistic resource allocation "consensus" and, like all techniques, exportable without reference to cultural identity. Conversely, we believe that democracy is a form of social life oriented to the development of self through the active participation of all citizens in the decisions. Democracy establishing the distinction between public and private sectors. People want to know where they end their money. Democracy is therefore not separable from the search for truth, dall''informazione the facts on which party should take, and his main enemies are lying, suspicion, manipulation and misinformation.
• The second difference is, therefore, foreign policy, which today means nothing more and nothing less than the war on terrorism declared by Bush at the time, Blair / Brown, Sarkozy and Berlusconi and the relations between Europe and the United States with respect to the relations with other cultures and civilizations. Also in this field is the decisive difference between deception and truth. On Iraq, we witnessed all''apologia of lies and hypocrisy of the mission was humanitarian, not given to Italian citizens a fair representation of the enormous interest of economic power and world domination that led Bush to take this unfortunate action. Have been impeded, in fact, any attempt to understand the reasons for the Islamic world, and even the piety and the reporting of the thousands of dead civilians, women, old people and children, killed by smart bombs, not just the U.S. military. It is shameful that in a democratic country who, while strongly condemning the savagery of terrorism, expressing outrage and condemnation of the massacres of Iraqi civilians, Afghans, is excluded from civil community and accused of complicity with the enemy. Guernica, the atomic bombs on Japan, the concentration camps we have had to leave the DNA in our outrage at the death. But now something has changed in the U.S. Obama is a new speanza.
• The third difference relates to the protection of life and the environment against the forms of hegemony of science and technology that tend to destroy the specificity of the differences between cultures and social identities. The relationship between technology and life is not only an ethical issue, but highly political, because it comes to choosing between un''omologazione essentially biological, based on the alleged neutrality the technique applied to the living, and a vision of "humanities" of the various companies. Only the great technology policy can govern without subjecting humanity to the technical system is currently linked to the economic interests of major powers.
they should share or not these considerations, in any case it is certain that if you want to beat the seemingly impolitic iperpoliticità the message and in particular the right of Berlusconi and Bossi, you have to raise the level of debate and bring it back on the issues that can now define the ground of high politics. The PD is not central to the model approved in part and must be recovered to a new dialogue with the left .. If you want, that is, knock, not a way to administer but a vision of society and fashion. You can still, in the era of globalization, we must talk about politics or resign themselves to the great triumph of individualism and individualized impersonal consumerism and hedonism in the form provided by the system-technical-economic system? This is the very ground on which to play the survival of the left.
The new left, are in reality mere empty words if you designate combinations without strong ideas, and values \u200b\u200bguide the focus of our discussion there is not the person. This should be discussed. From here we must begin to rebuild the Left and democracy in our country.
not miss this opportunity, we are discussing and putting in the new party left.

Bow & Arrow Windows 95

THE FINAL SEASON!

gasatissima am yesterday, since I Having regard to the 14th episode of the sixth season of Lost.

not want to anticipate anything, but how many emotions.

many questions yet to be revealed ... It 's been the most interesting part of the sixth series ... out of breath.

Good weekend to all ... it says that it will be good weather in Italy ... we hope!

Disney Cars Birthday Ideas Blogs

In relation to the previous post, I wanted to scream to everyone that a "little problem" I managed to fix it this morning!! So splash, but in the end I could!

Now I have to solve the second and I have to wait for the Lord to know if I can afford to do that thing for which I paid ... if I say no? I smile and go forward, knowing that you have wasted my money.

Tell that bitch I'll be too if I have some bad thoughts for this one?

Ps: i really bad thoughts about this girl I make them for several months!

PS2: I apologize if they are too tight, but these things too long and difficult to explain, but if all goes well I will, mainly driven by a spirit lighter than that right now I'm missing.